Page 29

My gaze drifted over to my tablet where I had my penthouse’s security feed up to watch my most prized possession. There was nothing new to report because Sutton hadn’t left her room after dinner wrapped up. I told myself that was preferable even though I wanted to spend more time with her, but after the interaction we had during our meal, it was best to give her space. At least, for now.

There was nothing to suggest she was doing anything other than sitting inside that room with the proof I’d given her still burning through her mind. I had shown her Cassie because withholding it wouldn’t have done either of us any good. That was the explanation I chose because it was the one that made the most sense. Sutton had asked for reassurance and I had provided a controlled version of it. In exchange, dinner had continued without a fork buried in my throat, which I considered a wonderful outcome under the circumstances.

It did not explain why I’d watched her face when she saw the photographs. I mapped every expression that flew by while she looked at the images in my head. It also did not explain why, when she tried so viciously not to cry, I had wanted to punish everyone who had ever made her feel that restraint was necessary, including myself, because I knew I contributed to that feeling as well.

That thought irritated me enough that I closed one of the emails I had opened without answering it. That gave me a chance to scan my inbox for any subjects that looked interesting and to my surprise, one jumped out at me from Nancy, my assistant:

Wiles and Co.— Prescott Vantage Legacy Client Escalation

I almost didn’t open it. Wiles and Co. meant nothing to me beyond a name on a roster of accounts I’d seen when I acquired Prescott Vantage and Nancy had a habit of flagging anything with the word escalation in it because she’d learned long ago that I preferred problems delivered to me intact rather than after someone had already failed to solve them. But because it was tied to my new acquisition, I decided to take a look.

When I clicked on the email, I was greeted by a wall of text that someone had clearly written and rewritten several times before sending. That alone told me the situation had degraded past the point where anyone in client relations felt confident managing it.

I read it twice for good measure. The first pass was for content. The second was because the content annoyed me enough that I wanted to be certain I hadn’t misunderstood what was going on.

Wiles and Co. was not a company in the traditional sense. It was the public-facing shell around a private family trust, three generations of inherited wealth folded into legal structures, philanthropic entities, holding companies, and quiet agreements designed to outlive everyone currently benefiting from them. Prescott Vantage did not manage their money. They managed the risk around it including the marriages, succession fights, board seats, political donations, buried scandals, and reputational fault lines that could turn private wealth into public bloodsport if handled badly.

It was exactly the kind of client Prescott Vantage had built its reputation on. Now, with Ashcroft Group attached to the firm, Wiles and Co. was threatening to walk.

Their reason was simple.

They wanted Sutton.

Not Prescott Vantage’s transition committee. Not the Ashcroft Group integration team. Not Sylvia Caldwell, a member of my general counsel who could quote regulatory language until she was blue in the face.

Sutton.

Wiles and Co. had declined three scheduled calls with our appointed relationship lead. Their counsel had returned Ashcroft Group’s continuity packet with tracked changes so aggressive it might as well have been written in red ink and contempt. One of their trustees, a man named Harold Lyle, had stated in no uncertain terms that the account would not proceed under new handling until Sutton Prescott personally confirmed that she would still be handling them as clients.

The email included a transcript from the most recent call attempt. I opened the attachment and read the exchange and quickly noted that Sylvia had done everything correctly. And that might have been part of the problem.

She had introduced herself with the proper credentials. She had referenced the acquisition language, the continuity provisions, the transition protections, the confidentiality obligations, and the specific internal controls Ashcroft Group had installed to ensure no disruption of service. Every sentence was polished, defensible, and useless when it came down to it.

According to the timestamp, Harold Lyle had let her speak for nearly four minutes before cutting in. “Ms. Caldwell, I do not doubt your qualifications. I doubt your relevance to Wiles and Co.”

Sylvia’s relevance to Ashcroft Group was beyond dispute as she was one of my best employees. Her relevance to Wiles and Co. was, apparently, nonexistent. Which was true because there hadn’t been enough time to build those relationships.

I scrolled down to continue reading.

Sylvia had attempted to recover with a measured explanation about continuity and Mr. Lyle had responded with, “Continuity is not a signature on a packet. Continuity is the person who knows why my daughter-in-law is not to be copied on correspondence involving the Westlake foundation. Continuity is the person who understands why the name Barlow should not appear in any memorandum that leaves that office. Continuity is the person who remembered that my brother’s second wife still has access to one trust document because a junior associate failed to update a distribution list in 2018.”

I stopped scrolling for a moment. This was not a client demanding a familiar face because he disliked change. This was a man reminding us that his account was a loaded weapon and Sutton was the only one who knew how to contain it.

Sylvia had asked if Mr. Lyle would agree to an interim review with senior counsel present.

“No,” he had said.

“Would you be willing to identify your immediate concerns so we can address them before Ms. Prescott resumes direct contact?”

“She has not resumed anything because she has not contacted us.”

“As I explained, Ms. Prescott is temporarily unavailable due to a private matter.”

“Private matters do not generally prevent Sutton Prescott from answering a message marked urgent by my office.”

Of course they hadn’t.

That was the part that made the line effective. Harold Lyle knew Sutton well enough to understand what usually happened when she was out of the office. He knew what was normal for her, what was a delay, and what was so unlike her that it became a signal in itself.