Page 76 of Where Would I Go?


Font Size:

Julian looks only at me. His voice is quieter now, strained. “So you just walk away?” He swallows hard. “You ruin my life, accuse me of abuse, file for divorce, drag everyone here… and you won’t even give me a chance?”

My eyes do not leave his. “I gave you five years.”

He stiffens.

I continue, my voice low and sure, “You are not entitled to a single day more.”

He stares at me, his expression cracking behind the eyes. His face slackens. His hands curl into loose fists on the table.

Margaret speaks again. “Mr. Ashworth, I need a clear answer from your counsel.” Her eyes go to his lawyer. “Does your client accept the proposed settlement, or are we proceeding toward trial?”

Julian’s jaw goes slack. “Trial? Are you kidding? You want all of this—my work, my reputation—dragged through the courts? You want everyone to hear this crap?” His voice rises, but underneath it something else bleeds through. Fear. The fear of exposure. The fear of a public record.

Margaret’s gaze is steady. “That choice, Mr. Ashworth, is entirely yours to make.”

His father shakes his head slowly, his disappointment aimed squarely at me.

Julian’s chair scrapes against the floor as he lurches forward. “Fine,” he says suddenly, his voice sharp and splintering. “Fine. Let’s go to trial.”

His lawyer turns toward him immediately. “Julian, I strongly advise against—”

“No.” Julian cuts him off. His eyes are locked on me, burning. “Let a judge see this. Let a judge see how wrong this is. That something isn’t right with her. That she needs professional help.”

My jaw tightens.

Every time he says I need help, a cold anger floods my veins.

I don’t needhelp. I need to be free of him.

“We need a professional,” he continues, his breath coming fast. “Someone impartial. Someone who can evaluate her state of mind. A forensic psychologist, maybe. Someone who can see how irrational this is. She just—” he gestures toward me, his hand trembling slightly, “—walked away. No warning. No conversation. That’s not the behavior of a stable person.”

His father nods once, sharp and curt. “That’s right.”

Julian’s lawyer speaks again. “Julian, proceeding to trial would involve significant expense and public exposure. I would strongly advise—”

“I don’t care,” Julian says, louder now. “I’m not signing a settlement that says I emotionally abused my wife. That’s defamation. I won’t sign it.”

Margaret leans forward, her elbows on the table, her voice dropping into a register that demands attention. “Then let’s be clear about what trial entails,” she says. “If this matter does not resolve through settlement and proceeds to litigation, the discovery phase will include sworn depositions from both parties, production of financial documentation for the entiretyof the marriage, forensic analysis of electronic communications, and third-party witness testimony from individuals with relevant knowledge of the marital dynamic.”

Julian scoffs. “Witnesses to what?”

“To your conduct,” she replies, her tone unchanged. “To the language you used with my client. To the expectations you imposed on her regarding domestic labor and personal autonomy. To your response when she began asserting independence. To your actions after she left the marital home—including your retention of a private investigator and your unannounced appearance at her place of employment, which multiple witnesses observed and are prepared to testify about.”

Julian freezes. “That’s not abuse,” he says finally, but his voice has lost its edge. “That’s a husband trying to save his marriage. There’s nothing wrong with that. Any jury would see that.”

Margaret doesn’t blink. “Intent does not negate impact, Mr. Ashworth. The court will be interested in the impact of your actions on my client’s psychological well-being, regardless of your stated intentions.”

The room falls silent.

Julian’s lawyer turns to him. “Julian, I need you to understand what a trial would entail. If we proceed to trial, the petitioner will submit all evidence into the record. Every communication. Every financial document. Every witness statement. It will be discoverable. It will be entered into the public docket. There will be no sealing this. No confidentiality.”

Julian waves a hand. “Fine. Let them see how irrational she’s acting.”

“It’s not about her,” his lawyer says, and for the first time his tone sharpens, just enough to cut through the bluster. “It’s about you. They will enter your conduct into the record. Your actions. Your statements. Your choices. This will not be an argumentabout feelings or interpretations. It will be a chronological presentation of behaviors, and each behavior will be cited as evidence supporting a claim of emotional abuse. That claim will appear in a court filing. With your name on it.”

Julian’s defiant posture holds, but the colour drains from his face. He had braced himself for a battle of narratives, a forum where he could perform the role of the wounded, devoted husband, betrayed by a wife whose mental state he could question. His lawyer is describing something else entirely.

His father’s sharp inhale cuts through the silence. He turns his head slowly toward his son, the earlier disapproval now edged with something colder: alarm.