Page 1 of Maksim


Font Size:

Chapter 1

Auralia

Thepaintingstaredbackat me from the examination table, judging me as I judged it. Sixteen feet of converted rope factory stretched above my head, exposed brick and industrial windows that let in the north light—the only kind worth working under if you want to see true color. I'd lived in this DUMBO studio for ten years, bought it when the neighbourhood still had edge and character as well as occasional gunshots. Now I had artisanal coffee shops for neighbours, but at least the light hadn't changed.

I adjusted my loupe and leaned closer.

The alleged Repin was magnificent. Even without authentication, without the provenance documents sitting in their manila folder on my desk, the painting commanded attention. A peasant woman stood at the edge of a wheat field, her face turned toward something beyond the canvas—the viewer could never know what she saw, only that it moved her.The brushwork was confident, alive. Each stroke existed exactly where it needed to be.

It was precise and perfect. Just like my new client.

He called himself Victor Harmon. I'd never met him, of course. We communicated through encrypted email and he paid in wire transfers, always on time, always the exact amount we'd agreed upon. He claimed the painting had been hidden in a private collection in St. Petersburg for decades, brought to America by a family fleeing the chaos of the post-Soviet years. It was a plausible story. I'd heard dozens of variations on it.

The provenance documentation was immaculate.

Too immaculate.

I pushed back from the table and let my eyes rest. The studio smelled of linseed oil and turpentine and old brick, scents that had seeped into my skin years ago and would probably follow me to the grave. Pigment samples lined the shelves in labelled glass vials, organized by manufacturer and date of production. My spectrophotometer sat on its dedicated workstation, the one piece of equipment I'd saved three years to afford. Reference books rose in tottering stacks against the walls, organized in a system only I understood.

Everything in its place. Everything making sense.

I returned to the painting.

The thing about forgers—the good ones, anyway—is that they understand art better than most legitimate artists. They study obsessively. They learn to see the way the masters saw, to move their hands the way dead geniuses moved theirs. The best forgeries aren't copies; they're love letters written in someone else's handwriting.

This painting wasn't a forgery.

I was almost certain of it. The craquelure—the fine network of cracks that develops in old paint over decades—followed the right patterns. The canvas showed appropriate age. Thepigments, from my preliminary analysis, were consistent with what Repin would have used in the 1880s. The stretcher bars were old, worn, carried the ghost impressions of previous frames.

But the paperwork . . . something about the paperwork gave me pause.

I pulled the folder toward me and flipped it open again. Export permits, customs declarations, letters of authenticity from two separate Russian institutions, photographs from what appeared to be archival collections. Everything dated correctly, aged appropriately, stamped and signed and notarized.

Everything a little too perfect.

Real provenance documents accumulate over time like sediment. They bear coffee stains from careless archivists. They reference other documents that may or may not survive. They contain typos, contradictions, gaps that later scholars try to explain. They're messy because life is messy, because history is messy, because the journey of any artwork through time is a chaotic tumble through changing hands and evolving markets and the occasional war.

Victor Harmon's documentation read like a forger's love letter to due diligence.

I reached for my UV torch.

Ultraviolet light reveals what the naked eye cannot. Old varnish fluoresces differently than new varnish. Retouched areas glow. Conservation efforts leave their signatures. I'd spent years learning to read these invisible stories, and the painting was about to tell me another one.

The beam swept across the surface.

I frowned.

The varnish layer fluoresced wrong. Too even, too consistent across the entire surface. Natural varnish accumulation happens in stages—a painting is varnished by its creator, then re-varnished by conservators over the following centuries, each application leaving its own fluorescent signature. This looked like a single application, carefully aged to appear old.

Not the painting. The varnish.

Someone had stripped and re-varnished this work within the last twenty years. Not necessarily a red flag—conservation efforts often required it. But combined with the too-perfect provenance . . .

I photographed the anomaly. Three angles, varying exposure settings. The images joined the others in my digital archive, dated and tagged and backed up to three separate locations.

I opened my notebook.

My records were meticulous. Obsessive, some might say, though I preferred "thorough." Every observation, every test, every measurement went into the leather-bound journals I'd kept since I started this work. Digital backups existed, of course, but I trusted paper in a way I didn't trust screens. Paper couldn't be hacked or corrupted. Paper was permanent. It had a patina.